Also, Guttenberg maintains that the tester's ears are psychophysiologically biased by the sound of one product while listening to the next product. Finally, the conditions under which the test is conducted are rarely the same as those in any given consumer's room, so the results mean nothing in terms of deciding what to buy.
Do you agree? Are blind comparisons of audio products valuable? On what do you base your position?
Vote to see the results and leave a comment about your choice.
Reviewer and long-time class-D detractor Michael Fremer was finally won over by the new Class D3 amp used in the SC-57 (shown above), but many audiophiles still scoff at this technology, preferring the sound of purely analog class-AB designs. What's your take? Have class-D amps finally achieved a performance level commensurate with class-AB?
Vote to see the results and leave a comment about your choice.
On the other hand, I do consider myself a videophileI spend hours calibrating my displays to meet the standards established by the industry, and I can't help noticing the smallest faults in a visual image. Of course, I also want my surround system to sound as good as possibleaudio is at least half the home-theater experience, after allso I carefully select and set up the audio components as well. But home theater is a fundamentally different experience than 2-channel music with no accompanying video.
What about you? Are you more of a 2-channel audiophile or home-theater videophile? Or do you pursue both hobbies about equally?
Vote to see the results and leave a comment about your choice.
| Displays Speakers | HT Systems Sources Electronics | Other Gear Software AV Interiors |
Top Picks
|
Community Show Reports |
Blogs
|
Shop Resources Subscriptions |









