I've wondered if Pioneers Kuro used to much power to work it's wonders & if so, could this be the reason Panasonic hasn't fully adapted it into their plasma line? Plasmas use somewhat more power than LCDs, so to add KURO to the mix would raise power levels to unacceptable levels.
Pure speculation on my part. Scott, you tested these sets, do you have their power levels available & if so, how do they compare with Panasonic's existing plasmas.
Panasonic BT300 Reference Plasma Monitor

The BT300 is the first Panasonic pro monitor to include a full color-management system. All three in the demo were calibrated for grayscale, and the BT300 was also tweaked to conform to the Rec.709 color gamut, and it showed in the more natural skin tones that seemed almost washed out next to the overblown skin tones on the other two screens.
Of course, the big question on my mind was whether or not the new monitor incorporated more Kuro technology than previous generations. The blacks were clearly no better than on the other two, so I had my doubts. When I asked about this, I was told that black level isn't the only important criterion, and Panasonic is emphasizing shadow detail over absolute black level. It's true that the shadow detail was better on the BT300, but I want deep black as well.
- Login or register to post comments


In my opinion, it will be inexcusable if Panasonic's so called "Reference Monitor" does not reproduce the deepest, accurate black level. In fact, how can they claim it's a reference monitor if they do not incorporate all the Kuro technology. They've had the technology long enough that I would think improvements would be on order. Absolutely mind boggling that Panasonic cannot give us both shadow detail and absolute blacks along with REC 709 color gamut. Especially at $5k. My expectations would be extremely high for a 50in that costs $5k.

| Displays Speakers | HT Systems Sources Electronics | Other Gear Software AV Interiors |
Top Picks
|
Community Show Reports |
Blogs
|
Shop Resources Subscriptions |


