The problem with electrostatic panels, like these, is that they are mechanically "accurate" but "unnatural" -- they confuse our brains. In nature, high frequency sounds don't emanate from sources five feet high and a foot or more wide, but from point sources. Read the blogs and you see people saying it took them six months "break in" their electrostatic speakers and to find just the right components to match them with. What they're "breaking in" is not the speakers but their brains which eventually learn to compensate for the weird spatial cues these speakers produce.
Electroecstatic

For those who aren't familiar with electrostatic speakers, they start with a large, thin, lightweight membrane impregnated with an electrically conductive material. This membrane, called the diaphragm, is stretched taut between two rigid, parallel, perforated metal plates called stators. The diaphragm is charged with a very high, constant voltage while the audio signal is fed to the stators, one out of phase with the other. As the current in the stators varies with the audio signal, the resulting electromagnetic fields push and pull the charged diaphragm, causing sound waves to emanate in front of and behind it, passing through the stators' perforations.
The CLX includes two electrostatic drivers, both 57 inches tall. The CLS Xstat driver uses ML's characteristic Curvilinear Line Source (CLS) design, in which the diaphragm and stators curve outward to disperse the midrange and high frequencies horizontally.
Low frequencies are reproduced by a second electrostatic driver called the DualForce. This flat transducer has two diaphragms with a third stator separating them, an approach designed to double the low-frequency output, since the two diaphragms vibrate in phase with each other (one is charged with positive voltage, the other with negative voltage). In addition, dipole-stabilization technology reduces the rear- and front-wave cancellation inherent in dipole drivers at low frequencies, increasing overall output and minimizing total harmonic distortion. With the Xstat and DualForce drivers in play, the CLX's frequency response is 56Hz to 23kHz, ±3dB.
The center channel of my dream MartinLogan system is served by the Stage, a hybrid design with two 6.5-inch aluminum-cone woofers flanking a CLS Xstat driver. In the center of the Xstat is a soft-dome tweeter. This unique mounting system is said to virtually eliminate high-frequency diffraction and increase midrange/treble phase coherence and time alignment while offering superior dispersion characteristics. Frequency response is spec'd at 69Hz to 22kHz, ±3dB.
Surround duties are handled by the Summit X, another hybrid design that combines a CLS Xstat panel with two 10-inch aluminum-cone woofers in ML's PoweredForce configuration. The woofers face forward and downward and operate in phase below 100Hz and out of phase above that frequency in order to mimic the dipole characteristics of the electrostatic panel without inducing cancellation at very low frequencies. As a result, the Summit X has a frequency response of 24Hz to 23kHz, ±3dB.
As you might have surmised by now, electrostatic transducers do not easily reproduce low frequencies, which is why many ML speakers are hybrids that include conventional cone-based woofers. This is especially important in the LFE department, so the company offers several non-electrostatic subwoofers, such as the top-dog Descent i. A surprisingly small sub, the Descent i includes three 10-inch aluminum-cone woofers in MartinLogan's BalancedForce configuration that places them facing outward at 120 degrees from each other, effectively canceling any cabinet vibrations. With three 250W power ampsone for each driverthis puppy reaches from 18 to 120Hz, ±3dB.
The ML system I've come up with here would be best served by at least two Descent i subs along with optional subwoofer-crossover boards for the CLXs. And it certainly needs a huge room, which shouldn't be a problem for anyone actually contemplating a purchase. If you're such a person, a 5.2 system starts at just over $46,000 and goes up from there depending on the finishes you want, while a 7.2 package will set you back at least $60,000. But hey, who cares about money when you're dreaming of being surrounded by the sound of MartinLogana sound whose well-deserved reputation I can enthusiastically confirm.
- Login or register to post comments

This is by far my dream system. Unnatural? I don't hear it that way, I think that they reproduce sound more natural than any other speaker system I have heard. It sounds like the vocalist, band, etc. are in the room with you. I used to be a fan of magna planars for the same reason but I must admit I think these create a better reproduction.

My previous HT setup was almost a match for that... In some ways better... Front Left and Right were Quad ESL989's, Rears were Quad ESL63's... Advantage - virtual point source.... I did have a plan to recommission my original Quad ELS' as center channel but it never happened. Lack of space forced me to downsize to moving metal speaker.... not as nice.... At some point in the future (when I have the space! - an all stat HT will reappear) The ability to reproduce micro details around all channels at low volumes (ie when listening at night without things cranked up..) was fabulous, and although there was no sub, I did not find it lacking in low frequencies (all 4 speakers were -relatively- full range, and especially the front.... and the Lexicon pre-pro seems to make the best of managing the bass) Although out and out loudness was not the systems strength - the ability to go from very quiet to full blast with detail throughout that dynamic range meant that I never felt the need for

I completely agree with David Laloum But I will add to it that I did listen to the CLX at FSI 2009 (Montreal Festival Son et Image). I hated them, they told me they did not warm up, etc. So I went back the next day and hated them again, they were driven by very good bryston electronics. Of course it is always unjust to judge at a show but still, listening to two of my orchestral CDs the image was very wrong no sense of where the instruments were relative to one another. So I bougth 2905!!! My own multi-channel music system is now Quad ESL-2905, 988 for surround and 63 for centers and 1 back channel (e.g. 6.1 system) And I agree that their point source caracteristics means they mix up very well. I am in heaven without needing to die for it :-)

Scott, you are right about the dome tweeter in the center speaker. Quad handles the problem this way: "[The speaker] employs 8 electrostatic panels, the inner two utilising the concentric rings of anodes used to create the point source image." ML has not addressed this issue in the past. I heard a pair of their best panels in a high-end showroom giving a beautiful reproduction of a small choir of mixed voices, but the singers were suspended "in the middle of the air," like Ezekiel's wheel, with their feet about eight feet off the floor. I doubt the recording engineer intended that floating angels effect.
| Displays Speakers | HT Systems Sources Electronics | Other Gear Software AV Interiors |
Top Picks
|
Community Show Reports |
Blogs
|
Shop Resources Subscriptions |


